As ACIP Scrutiny Mounts, Medical Leaders and Health Advocates Warn of Eroding Access to Vaccines
- Sep 26, 2025
- 4 min read
Updated: Oct 3, 2025
Ahead of the Sept. 18-19 meeting of the CDC Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), leading medical groups and advocacy organizations emphasized significant concerns about ACIP members’ guidance on vaccine policy.
More than 5,100 individuals and groups submitted written public comments ahead of the meeting, the first since the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services added five more members without the traditional vetting process. Their concerns covered specific therapeutic areas under consideration, the role of ACIP in vaccine access and coverage, and myriad ways changing guidance will hurt children and adults’ health.
Here’s an overview of top organizations’ statements, with links to their full submissions. PFID’s comment letter is available here.
Alliance for Women’s Health and Prevention
“AWHP is concerned by the fact that the nation’s medical societies — representing hundreds of thousands of medical professionals across the country — have differing recommendations from the ACIP’s for the first time in history. We cannot ignore this divergence, especially given that these medical societies review extensive evidence in their decision-making. We must not question the commitment of these groups to protecting the health of the patients that they serve.”
Full statement here.
American Academy of Pediatrics
“We are dismayed by the decision of CDC to prohibit representatives from organizational liaisons from participating in ACIP work groups. These work groups are instrumental to the committee in reviewing data on vaccines and providing draft recommendations. It is important for CDC to be able to communicate openly with medical organizations on issues that come before ACIP, particularly to discuss implementation issues with new recommendations. Not allowing liaison representatives on ACIP’s work groups removes subject matter expertise and calls into question the work product of these groups.”
Full statement here.
American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists
“The Maternal Immunization Task Force strongly reaffirms the importance of recommending and advocating for all routinely recommended maternal vaccines and the hepatitis B vaccine at birth for all newborns. The proven safety and efficacy of these vaccines have led to their recommendation during pregnancy and after birth. Yet, the continued decline in vaccination rates among this population highlights a critical need: a renewed commitment to educating the public and patients on the benefits of vaccination and removing barriers to access.”
Full statement here.
American Pharmacists Association
“As one of the most successful immunizing professionals, pharmacists’ authority to immunize is crucial in the health care system, providing the scientifically proven best defensive possible against vaccine-preventable diseases. In many states, pharmacists’ authority to administer immunizations is tightly bound to ACIP and CDC guidance throughout state statues, regulations, and protocols. … Patients will lose access to vaccine services in almost every state if ACIP integrity is not maintained or if undue restrictions are placed on vaccine access by ACIP.
Full statement here.
American Society for Meningitis Prevention
“ACIP recommendations are not abstract, they have real-life impact. They determine whether insurance covers vaccines, whether families can access them easily at pharmacies and clinics, and whether protection is available during pregnancy, infancy, or outbreaks. If recommendations are restricted or delayed, millions could face higher costs, added barriers, and missed protection.”
Full statement here.
Immunization Alliance for Equity and Access
“We firmly believe that every parent has the right to make informed decisions for their children. However, those decisions must be guided by clear, objective, and scientifically rigorous recommendations. Eliminating the universal recommendation would create unnecessary barriers and confusion, limiting access to the vaccine and undermining parents’ ability to choose to protect their babies.”
Full statement here.
Infectious Diseases Society of America
“Reliable information is essential to preserve vaccine access for all Americans who want and need to be vaccinated, enable clinicians to offer the highest quality care and empower individuals to make the best-informed decisions about their own health and their families’ health. Recommendations should be based on high-quality, objective scientific data collected and analyzed by CDC scientists and not influenced by political appointees.”
Full statement here.
National Coalition for Infant Health
“Protecting infants, especially those most vulnerable to respiratory illness, requires timely access to care and meaningful clinical choice. No single preventive option works for every family, every provider, or every setting. Families deserve not only access to safe and effective immunizations, but also the flexibility to make informed decisions—aided by broad, inclusive recommendations — with their healthcare providers.”
Full statement here.
National Consumers League
"NCL's founder, born in 1859, lost multiple siblings to diphtheria and other diseases that are simply unknown to Americans today because of vaccines. It's worth remembering that the great president Abraham Lincoln lost two sons to diseases for which children can now be immunized against — one from tuberculosis at nearly 4 years old, and another to typhoid at 11. The heartbreak remained with Mr. Lincoln and his wife for the remainder of their lives. We never want to return to those dark days."
Full statement here.
National Foundation for Infectious Diseases
“NFID strongly supports the continued use of expert, evidence-based guidance to inform public health policy and protect the health of people across the US. NFID would like to emphasize the importance of the ACIP’s systematic review of scientific evidence and disease impact to guide US vaccine policy.”
Full statement here.
Prevent Cancer Foundation
“The hepatitis B vaccine is safe, effective, and well-studied. Over four decades of CDC research show only mild side effects, and the vaccine has been administered over one billion times worldwide, providing lasting protection.”
Full statement here.

Vì chủ yếu chơi trên điện thoại nên mình khá chú ý đến trải nghiệm mobile. Khi thử chuyển từ slot sang thể thao rồi qua game bài, mình thấy tốc độ tải khá nhanh. Nội dung được phân chia rõ nên việc điều hướng cũng nhẹ nhàng. Lúc mình vào https://lx88bet.com/ xem kỹ hơn thì thấy bắn cá và nổ hũ cũng được bố trí khá gọn. Theo mình, cách tổ chức này giúp LX88 mang lại trải nghiệm khá liền mạch.
Mình thường đọc kỹ phần thống kê trước khi trải nghiệm một nền tảng giải trí trực tuyến. Khi xem qua các con số được công bố, mình thấy hệ thống đề cập đến lượng tài khoản hoạt động và số trò chơi phong phú. Trong quá trình tìm hiểu thêm về Open88 mình nhận thấy cấu trúc nội dung được xây dựng mạch lạc, giúp người dùng dễ theo dõi. Giao diện nhìn gọn gàng và thân thiện. Cá nhân mình cảm thấy cách trình bày khá rõ ràng.
trực tiếp bóng đá – mình vừa lướt thử cho biết vì thấy mấy đứa bạn hay nhắc, chứ cũng không kỳ vọng gì nhiều. Mở lên cái thấy trang nhìn khá thoáng, kiểu bố cục chia khối rõ ràng nên mắt bắt thông tin nhanh, không bị rối. Mình để ý cái menu đặt ngay chỗ dễ thấy, bấm qua lại mấy mục cũng mượt, không phải mò lâu mới ra. Lướt xuống thì các phần nội dung xếp theo dạng cột nên nhìn gọn, cảm giác mọi thứ được gom nhóm ổn. Nói chung mới vào không bị “ngợp” vì họ sắp xếp các khối nội dung và thanh menu ngay trên trang đầu nhìn rất rõ.
mình vừa lướt thử HITCLUB cho biết vì thấy mấy đứa bạn hay nhắc, chứ cũng không kỳ vọng gì nhiều. Mở lên cái thấy trang nhìn khá thoáng, kiểu bố cục chia khối rõ ràng nên mắt bắt thông tin nhanh, không bị rối. Mình để ý cái menu đặt ngay chỗ dễ thấy, bấm qua lại mấy mục cũng mượt, không phải mò lâu mới ra. Lướt xuống thì các phần nội dung xếp theo dạng cột nên nhìn gọn, cảm giác mọi thứ được gom nhóm ổn. Nói chung mới vào không bị “ngợp” vì họ sắp xếp các khối nội dung và thanh menu ngay trên trang đầu nhìn rất rõ.
Khi đang đọc các bình luận trao đổi trên một diễn đàn, mình bắt gặp một TG88 được chèn vào giữa câu chuyện. Mình bấm thử xem cho biết, chủ yếu là để xem cách trình bày và cấu trúc nội dung. Lướt nhanh thì thấy tổng thể khá gọn gàng, tạo cảm giác đáng tin cậy. Xem xong mình quay lại đọc tiếp các bình luận khác, chứ cũng không đào sâu thêm